FinOps for AI: How to Stop Bleeding Money on Inference Costs

Your AI pilot cost €50 a month. Production is €5,000. Welcome to the world of variable costs nobody warned you about.

---

There’s a conversation happening in companies worldwide:

“The AI pilot was great. We’ve approved the move to production.”

Three months later:

“Why is the OpenAI/Azure/AWS bill ten times what we budgeted?”

The answer is simple: nobody did FinOps for AI. And in 2026, that’s no longer optional.

What is FinOps (and why it matters now)

FinOps is the discipline of managing cloud costs continuously. Not “looking at the invoice at the end of the month.” It’s understanding what you spend, why you spend it, and how to optimize it.

In traditional cloud (servers, storage), costs are relatively predictable. You provision X instances, pay Y per month. You can budget.

With AI, costs are variable and can explode without warning:

• You pay per input and output token
• You pay per API call
• You pay per inference time
• You pay for embedding storage
• You pay for fine-tuning

And the worst part: usage scales with success. If your AI application works well, more people use it. More usage = more cost. Success can bankrupt you. The dramatic price drops of the last two years have democratized access, but they’ve also led many companies to jump in without calculating what happens when they scale.

The costs nobody budgets for

Inference: the silent killer

Training a model is expensive but it’s a one-time (or periodic) cost. Inference is every time the model processes something. And that’s continuous.

An internal chatbot answering 1,000 questions a day with GPT-5 can cost €500-1,000 per month in API calls alone. Scale to 10,000 questions and you’re at €5,000-10,000.

Did you budget for that? Probably not.

Tokens: the meter you can’t see

LLMs charge per token (roughly 4 characters = 1 token). But it’s not just the response tokens that count. It’s also the question. And the context you send.

If your application sends 2,000 tokens of context with every question so the model “understands” the situation, you’re paying for those 2,000 tokens every time. Thousands of times a day.

Optimizing context can cut costs by 50-70%. But it requires work nobody plans for.

Embeddings and vector search

RAG (Retrieval-Augmented Generation) applications need to convert documents into embeddings and search vector databases. That has a cost:

• Generating embeddings: cost per token
• Storing embeddings: cost per GB
• Searching embeddings: cost per query

A knowledge base of 10,000 documents can cost hundreds of euros per month in vector infrastructure alone.

Fine-tuning and retraining

If you customize models, every fine-tuning cycle costs money. And if you do it frequently (to keep the model up to date), those costs add up.

Metrics you should be tracking

The companies that control AI costs measure these things. And they’re the same ones achieving real ROI — because you can’t optimize what you don’t measure.

Cost per conversation/interaction

How much does each user interaction with your AI cost? If your chatbot costs €0.15 per conversation and you have 10,000 conversations a day, that’s €1,500 daily. €45,000 a month.

Cost per insight (for analytics)

If you’re using AI for data analysis, how much does each insight cost to generate? Is the cost worth the value of the insight?

Cost per model/use case

Not all use cases are equal. Maybe your FAQ chatbot costs €0.02 per interaction and your analysis assistant costs €0.50. Knowing this lets you prioritize.

Input/output token ratio

If you’re sending 5,000 tokens of context to receive 100 tokens of response, your ratio is 50:1. That’s inefficient. Optimize the context.

Cost per active user

How much does each user actively using your AI tools cost you? If the cost exceeds the value they generate, you have a problem.

Optimization strategies

1. Pick the right model for each task

Don’t use GPT-5 for everything. For simple tasks (classification, basic extraction), smaller, cheaper models work just as well.

Task	Recommended model	Relative cost
Simple classification	GPT-4.1 mini / Claude Haiku	Low
Text summarization	GPT-4.1 mini / Mistral Small	Low
Complex analysis	GPT-5 / Claude Sonnet	Medium
Advanced reasoning	GPT-5.2 / Claude Opus	High

Using the expensive model for everything is like taking a cab everywhere. Sometimes the subway gets you there just fine.

2. Optimize your context

Every context token costs money. Review what you’re sending:

• Do you need the full conversation history or just the last 3 messages?
• Can you summarize the context instead of sending it raw?
• Are you sending redundant information?

Cutting context from 3,000 to 1,000 tokens reduces cost by 66% per call.

3. Cache common responses

If 20% of questions are the same (FAQs), cache the responses. Don’t call the API for something you answered yesterday.

A well-implemented cache system can reduce API calls by 30-50%.

4. Implement smart rate limiting

Not every user needs instant AI responses. You can:

• Limit calls per user/hour
• Queue non-urgent requests
• Offer service tiers (fast but expensive vs. slow but cheap)

5. Consider on-premise models for high volume

If your volume is high enough, running models locally can be cheaper than paying per API call. The break-even point depends on your case, but typically:

• < 100,000 calls/month: API is cheaper
• > 500,000 calls/month: evaluate on-premise
• > 1,000,000 calls/month: on-premise probably wins

6. Monitor in real time

Don’t wait for the end-of-month bill. Set up alerts:

• If daily spend exceeds X, notify
• If a user consumes more than Y, investigate
• If cost per interaction rises, something changed

Tools like LangSmith, Helicone, or even custom dashboards give you this visibility.

The most common mistake

The mistake I see constantly: budgeting for the pilot, not for production. It’s the same pattern we see in the gap between pilots and production — 84% of companies haven’t redesigned a single job role, and most haven’t redesigned a single budget either.

A pilot with 100 test users for a month tells you nothing about real costs. Production with 10,000 users for a year is a different story entirely.

Before going to production, do the math:

• Expected users × interactions per user × cost per interaction × 12 months
• Add a 50% buffer for growth and surprises
• Does the ROI still make sense?

If the math doesn’t work in a spreadsheet, it won’t work in reality. 95% of companies see no results with AI and one of the main reasons is that costs eat the return.

The real ROI

The number going around is $2.78 return for every dollar invested in AI. Sounds great. But that return only exists if you control costs.

If your AI project generates €100,000 in value but costs €80,000 in APIs, your real ROI is 1.25:1, not 2.78:1.

FinOps isn’t bureaucracy. It’s the difference between a profitable AI project and one that burns money. If you’re an SMB and want to know where to start without throwing money away, here’s the truth about implementing AI in small businesses.

---

Keep exploring

• The Hard Truth: Only 5% of Companies See Real AI ROI - The real return numbers and why most projects fail
• On-premise is back: why companies are fleeing AI cloud - When it makes sense to stop paying for APIs and build your own infrastructure
• State of Enterprise AI in 2026 - The Deloitte report showing the gap between pilots and production